Wednesday, April 9, 2025

Iran’s Water Crisis

 Iran is suffering its worst water crisis of its entire modern existence. Decades of neglect and mismanagement of its water infrastructure by the Iranian government, along with geopolitical factors that have cut off Tehran’s access to the foremost experts in water management — the hated state of Israel — are two of the factors. So is the steep rise in Iran’s population, which went from 37 million when the ayatollahs’ regime took over to 90 million today, with the obvious concomitant rise in water use. The nuclear project that Iran’s rulers insist on continuing has cost the country tens of billions of dollars in both direct costs and from the sanctions imposed on Iran by the West — money that might have been spent on water conservation, advanced water-saving irrigation techniques, desalination plants, and even on the Watergen machines, a recent Israeli invention that produce drinking water from the circumambient air. Furthermore, the nuclear facilities require a great deal of water to keep them cooled so that there is no danger of meltdown. Then there are the effects of global warming, that increase the evaporation from lakes, rivers, and reservoirs. All of these contribute to creating the worst water crisis in Iran’s history. More on this crisis, to which there is no simple answer, can be found here: “Iran’s water crisis at tipping point in threat to Islamic regime’s stability,” by Ohad Merlin, Jerusalem Post, March 30, 2025:

“Iran is drying up,” Dr. Sharona Mazalian Levi from The Alliance Center for Iranian Studies at Tel Aviv University affirmed, painting a grim picture of what she described as one of the most pressing environmental challenges facing the Islamic Republic today.

“Iran is facing an unprecedented water crisis that threatens the nation’s stability,” Mazalian Levi said. She explained that multiple factors have converged to create this critical situation, with several major provinces now reaching what she deemed “a tipping point.”

According to Mazalian Levi, the Iranian Energy Ministry declared last week that the provinces of Tehran, Isfahan, Razavi Khorasan, and Yazd are facing a severe water crisis. She highlighted the alarming state of the Karaj Dam, which supplies water to millions in Tehran and the surrounding areas.

The water crisis is almost everywhere in Iran, but at its worst in four of the country’s main provinces, including Tehran. The Karaj Dam on which people in Tehran, the capital, rely, is down to only 6% of capacity. And the water level is still decreasing.

“The Karaj Dam is now at only 6% of its capacity,” she noted, referencing reports from Tasnim news agency that 94% of the reservoir is empty. “This isn’t just an environmental issue; it’s a potential catalyst for civil unrest and disorder that could lead to national instability.”

This water crisis should be distinguished from those which brought Iranian protesters out in the past. In 2009, they were protesting the lack of political freedom. In 2022, demonstrators came out across Iran to protest the killing of Mahsa Amini, a Kurdish Iranian girl, by the morality police who had picked her up for incorrectly wearing her hijab. The water crisis transcends those; it affects everyone in Iran, even supporters of the regime.

Two of the main catalysts for the crisis are what Mazalian Levi named “poor management of the water sector,” as well as a population growth of more than 250% in only 50 years. “This includes over-extraction from natural water sources and aquifers to the point of depletion,” she added.

It ordinarily takes thousands of years for large aquifers to accumulate water, and it will take the same amount of time to fully replenish them.. That makes it essentially a non-renewable resource that Iran, which has recently had almost no rain or snowmelt, has been using up at a dizzying pace. It would have been much better for Iran had it instead relied on husbanding the water it uses for irrigation, and even more important, much better if it had built still more, and more advanced, desalination plants along its shore with the Persian Gulf in the south and the Caspian Sea in the north.

However, Mazalian Levi traced the origins of the crisis further back in history. According to the researcher, following the 1979 revolution, Iran found itself internationally isolated and was forced to develop an autarkic economic system. Religious leaders, including then-supreme leader Ruhollah Khomeini, encouraged citizens to embrace farming and agriculture as a way of life, drawing from texts regarding the Prophet Muhammad himself.

When Ayatollah Khomeini came to power in 1979, Iran became a pariah state. The regime decided it would rely as little as possible on the outside world, and Iranians who had left the land to flock to the cities for work under the Shah were now encouraged to return to rural areas to grow food for the country. This increase in the agricultural economy required more water to be used. However, the water-saving irrigation methods developed by the Israelis, such as drip irrigation, and the advanced desalination plants in whose construction Israel is a world leader, were not available due to the ayatollahs’ determination to have nothing to do with the “Zionist entity.”


Iran's Water Crisis | Frontpage Mag

Monday, April 7, 2025

A majority of self-identified leftists think political assassination is a societal good

 By Andrea Widburg

Before the 21st century, Democrats were mostly working- and middle-class Americans who believed in the rule of law and loved America. The murderous ones—the violent Black Panthers and Weathermen—existed on the fringe. Now, though, the fringe has moved to the heart of the Democrat party, which is a death cult. And like all death cults, it’s requiring greater sacrifices. The latest manifestation is that a majority of self-identified leftists believe that assassinating people for political ends (e.g., Donald Trump and Elon Musk) is fully justified.

One of the things that radical Muslims and leftists have in common is that they are death cults. The Islamic penchant for rape, torture, and murder on gleefully sadistic scales (e.g., the Yazidis, Israelis, and Christians in Africa) speaks for itself. However, we in the West have been indoctrinated not to recognize the Democrat death cult for what it is.

Abortion, once framed as a rare act to protect women from abuse or death, is now a massive industry with heavy government funding. Women no longer feel it’s a last resort. It is, instead, a first resort to preserve a woman’s comfort level and even something to be proudly “shouted.” Since 1973, it’s estimated that over 63 million babies have been shouted out of existence. Even the pagans limited themselves to sacrificing only a few babies, and they did it out of a desperate need to placate the gods, not to follow their bliss.


The climate change belief system is also a death cult. Its more fervent adherents are open about the need to reduce the human population by 90% or so. The rank and file, who also believe that Mother Gaia (that is, the insensate Earth) can only be saved by erasing the human beings who give the Earth value, won’t speak in terms of mass depopulation, but they will stop having children.

And finally, transgenderism is a death cult. When you are pushing an ideology that encourages people to sterilize their children or themselves, and when you are advocating “care” that radically increases suicide rates...that’s a death cult.

In addition to death, leftism is a violent cult. While leftists like to focus obsessively on January 6, the reality is that the greatest amount of political violence in America is tied to the left. Most recently, George Floyd’s drug death in 2020 led to protests so violent that they resulted in the highest recorded civil disorder damages in American history: $1-2 billion in insured damages and over two dozen people killed. However, the Democrat party’s violent antics stretch back much further:

  • The American Civil War
  • The KKK
  • The 1960s protests
  • The 1970s underground bombings and shootings (e.g., the Weathermen), all of which came from the American left and, as Bill and Bernardine Ayers show, melded into the Democrat party
  • The Ferguson riots after Michael Brown’s suicide by cop
  • The Baltimore riots after Freddie Gray died
  • The 2017 attempt to assassinate the entire Republican House leadership.
  • The antisemitic violence across America’s campuses since October 7, 2023
  • The mourning when the two assassination attempts on Trump failed
  • The celebration of Luigi Mangione for assassinating an insurance company executive
  • The war on Tesla owners, even though those same owners were once leftist darlings because many bought their cars as part of the climate death cult
  • Murder Justification: 31% and 38% of respondents stated it would be at least someone justified to murder Elon Musk and President Trump, respectively.
  • These effects were largely driven by respondents that self-identified as left of center, [fn. omitted] with 48% and 55% at least somewhat justifying murder for Elon Musk and President Trump, respectively, indicating significantly higher justification for violence against these figures.
  • Property Destruction: Nearly 40% of respondents (39.8%) stated it is at least somewhat acceptable (or more) to destroy a Tesla dealership in protest.
  • Psychological/Ideological Correlations with Assassination Culture: These beliefs are highly correlated with one another, as well as with the justification of the murder of the UnitedHealthcare CEO and hyper-partisan left-wing ideology.
  • Online Amplification of Radical Ideation: BlueSky plays a significant and predictive role in amplifying radical ideation.

And that’s just what I can think of off the top of my head.


But the blood lust is growing. The Network Contagion Research Institute and the Rutgers University Social Perception Lab conducted a joint poll of 1,264 people to determine their perceptions about politicized violence. Although we’ve all seen the verbal insanity unleashed against Donald Trump and Elon Musk since the election, it was still shocking to learn that a majority of leftists, especially those who escaped X’s allegedly toxic atmosphere for the “safe space” of Blue Sky, support political violence, including assassination:

The findings signal a threat to political stability and public safety. Key data points include:

[snip]

You can read the whole study here, although I warn you that it’s deeply depressing.

However, it’s not surprising. When it comes to Democrat violence, it’s not just the Antifa types. The mainstream media, whether MSNBC, The Washington Post, CNN, or the harridans of The View, encourage radicalism and constantly hint that violence is an acceptable approach to politics:

more at


A majority of self-identified leftists think political assassination is a societal good - American Thinker

Friday, April 4, 2025

Records reveal Liberal government spent $54 million on COVID ads aimed at young Canadians

 OTTAWA (LifeSiteNews) — The Liberal government spent $54 million in taxpayer money on COVID propaganda targeting young Canadians.

According to documents obtained through access to information requests by Rebel News, the Liberal government, under the leadership of former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, shelled out $54 million on COVID ads beginning in 2021.

The campaign, titled the “COVID-19 Public Health Measures during Vaccine Rollout,” sought to “inform Canadians of the public health measures they need to follow” during the COVID “pandemic.”

The project began in summer 2021 and continued until March 31, 2022. While the program began as a $30 million “national public education” initiative, it later grew into a $54 million campaign to “increase awareness, motivate interest, and generate engagement.”

The Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) especially targeted young Canadians ages 18-24 because they “may play down the seriousness of the situation.”

A sub-campaign under the $54 million program aimed to convince young Canadians to take the experimental COVID shots on the false claim that they were “safe and effective.”

Since the start of the COVID crisis, official data shows that the virus has been listed as the cause of death for less than 20 kids in Canada under age 15. This is out of six million children in the age group.

The COVID jabs approved in Canada have also been associated with severe side effects such as blood clots, rashes, miscarriages, and even heart attacks in young, healthy men.

During the COVID “pandemic” and vaccine rollout, government subsidized media outlets, particularly the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC), worked tirelessly to convince the Canadian public to take the experimental shots and follow irrational COVID regulations.

Tuesday, April 1, 2025

Red Pill exposed: Andrew Tate's ex says he nearly choked her unconscious, labeled her his 'property': lawsuit

 Andrew Tate's former girlfriend has accused the online influencer of beating and choking her while they were in a relationship, alleging in a lawsuit that Tate also labeled her his "property" and threatened to kill her if she crossed him. 

Brianna Stern, a model, filed the lawsuit on Thursday in the Los Angeles County Superior Court against Tate, a self-proclaimed "misogynist." The filing alleges that Tate lured Stern into a relationship by behaving lovingly toward her, The Associated Press reported Sunday.

The lawsuit comes as the former professional boxer and his brother, Tristan Tate, are under investigation by British and Romanian authorities on allegations of human trafficking, money laundering and sex crimes. The pair has denied all of the accusations against them. 

Stern says she met Tate in January 2024 because the brothers were looking for models to help promote their cryptocurrency meme coin. The model traveled to Romania, where she eventually began a relationship with the elder Tate brother, who convinced her that the media stories about him were untrue. 

Stern alleges that Tate forced her to get a tattoo that reads "Property of Tate," something that the lawsuit states he had required of several former girlfriends. 


Andrew Tate's ex says he beat, choked and degraded her: lawsuit | U.S.




Carney’s Snap Election -- And Trump Saw It Coming

 By Sonia Bailley

Mark Carney’s snap election is a globalist power grab disguised as leadership, continuing Trudeau’s agenda with a more polished image. But Donald Trump saw this coming -- and he may be the only one ready to stop it.

Mark Carney’s sudden rise to power isn’t a win for democracy -- it’s a globalist takeover in a Canadian suit. Recentlyinstalled as Prime Minister of Canada without a single vote, Carney now leads both the country and the Liberal Party just months before a federal snap election that he called. This isn’t about Canadian politics -- it’s about global control. 

But Canadians have seen this movie before. Carney is former prime minister Trudeau’s spiritual twin: polished, elitist, and devoted to the same globalist networks. The only difference? Carney doesn’t wear blackface -- he wears a central banker’s smile. If you think you’re voting for a nationalist in Carney, think again. You're voting for a globalist in a Canadian suit.

Trump saw it coming long before most Canadians did. His unapologetic stance against Trudeau wasn’t just bluster -- it was a strategic masterstroke. When Trump floated the idea of annexing Canada, it wasn’t a real policy proposal. It was a provocation designed to rattle the status quo -- and it worked. Trudeau’s image crumbled under the weight of his own hypocrisy, incompetence, and allegiance to foreign interests. Trump exposed him on the world stage without firing a shot.

Now, Trudeau is gone -- but the machine that backed him is not. Mark Carney stepped into power not through a democratic vote, but by appointment: unelected, unaccountable, and even more dangerous than his predecessor. A longtime insider of the World Economic Forum (WEF), the Bank of Canada, the Bank of England, and the UN’s climate finance movement, Carney is not a nationalist. He is a globalist operative tasked with keeping the Liberal regime alive and Canada under elite control.

Carney’s snap election wasn’t about democracy -- it was a power play. Called a full six months ahead of the planned October vote -- this snap election is designed to catch the opposition unprepared, consolidate Liberal power, and secure a mandate before Canadians fully understand who Carney is and what he represents. It’s a calculated move to capitalize on the rise of Canadian nationalism, partly influenced by Trump’s strategic rhetoric, to lock in globalist control before any serious opposition can form. It’s a rushed coronation, not a democratic process -- engineered to silence dissent and restore globalist influence before the next wave of nationalist momentum, which will seek to dismantle globalism, hits.

The media isn’t holding Carney accountable either, because it’s on the same payroll. Canadian legacy outlets like CBC, CTV, and several French-language news organizations, receive hundreds of millions in taxpayer funding and serve as mouthpieces for the Liberal-aligned establishment, echoing globalist agendas, such as climate policy, censorship laws, and economic centralization. The media’s role isn’t to question globalist power, but to preserve it. Under Trudeau, the Canadian government funneled money into newsrooms under the guise of supporting journalism. In reality, the government created a media class that protects elite narratives, silences dissent, and shields figures like Carney from scrutiny. Carney’s policies are cut from the same cloth as Trudeau’s:

  • Central bank power over democratic control
  • Carbon taxes over economic freedom
  • Multinational corporations over small local businesses
  • Digital currency over hard cash
  • Mass immigration over secure borders
  • Global alliances over national sovereignty
  • Climate mandates over economic growth
  • Censorship laws over free speech
  • Digital surveillance over privacy rights

This is what globalism looks like. These policies aren’t just hypotheticals, they’re already starting to take shape in Canada, and are fully implemented in places like China. What’s happening now is just the beginning. Globalism isn’t about helping people; it’s about controlling them. It’s about dismantling national identity, weakening self-reliance, and transferring power from elected citizens to unelected bureaucrats at the WEF, UN, and International Monetary Fund (IMF).


Carney’s Snap Election -- And Trump Saw It Coming - American Thinker

Iran’s Water Crisis

  Iran is suffering its worst water crisis of its entire modern existence. Decades of neglect and mismanagement of its water infrastructure ...